Please remember that all materials submitted for consideration to IJRESM are confidential, and should not be distributed, shared, used or otherwise supplied to third parties prior to publication. Please phrase your reviews politely; even 'bad' papers represent a lot of work on the part of the authors. The review may be the basis for further revisions of the paper or the work that the paper reports. We all know how hurtful a needlessly negative review can be, and how helpful a positive one can be; please try to bear that in mind when you are writing yours.
| Reviewer’s Name: | Review Date: | Manuscript Number: | Article Title: |
|---|---|---|---|
A. Recommended disposition of the paper
(Bold appropriate option from the following)
B. General rating of the paper: Rating 1 to 5 (1-Poor, 2-Average, 3-Good, 4-Verygood, 5-Excellent)
| Parameter | Rating |
|---|---|
| Significance of subject matter | |
| Originality | |
| Quality of writing | |
| Quality of proposed method / Overall content in case of review | |
| Orginization of Paper | |
| Overall Rating |
C. Specific Reviewer Comments and Suggestions to the author:
D. Any Comments to editor